Design and Interior

The CX-3 and CX-5, while compact crossover SUVs from Mazda, exhibit distinct exterior and interior designs that cater to different types of buyers. The CX-3’s exterior design is characterized by its bold and sporty stance, featuring a more angular front fascia with a prominent grille and swept-back headlights. In contrast, the CX-5 boasts a sleeker and more refined appearance, with a smoother, curved design language.

Inside, the CX-3 offers a snug and premium-feeling cabin, with available features like leather-trimmed seats and a touchscreen infotainment system. The CX-5, on the other hand, provides a more spacious and luxurious interior, complete with amenities like heated and ventilated front seats and a 11-speaker Bose audio system.

While both models share some similarities in their design elements, their distinct approaches may appeal to different types of buyers. For instance, the CX-3’s sporty vibe may attract younger drivers seeking a fun-to-drive companion for daily commutes or weekend adventures. Conversely, the CX-5’s more refined and spacious interior may appeal to families or professionals who prioritize comfort and practicality in their SUV.

Performance and Handling

Powering Ahead

Under the hood, both Mazda CX-3 and CX-5 offer a range of engine options to cater to different driving preferences. The CX-3 is available with a 2.0-liter inline-four cylinder engine producing 146 horsepower and 146 lb-ft of torque, paired with either a six-speed automatic or a six-speed manual transmission. This powertrain provides decent acceleration and handling for its compact size.

In contrast, the CX-5 offers two engine options: a 2.0-liter inline-four cylinder producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque, or a 2.5-liter turbocharged inline-four cylinder producing 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. The more powerful engine is paired with a six-speed automatic transmission with paddle shifters, allowing for seamless gear changes.

Fuel Efficiency

While both models provide decent fuel efficiency, the CX-3’s 2.0-liter engine returns an estimated 27 mpg combined (23 city, 32 highway) with the automatic transmission and 26 mpg combined (22 city, 31 highway) with the manual transmission. The CX-5’s 2.0-liter engine achieves an estimated 25 mpg combined (21 city, 30 highway), while the turbocharged 2.5-liter engine returns an estimated 23 mpg combined (20 city, 28 highway).

Driving Dynamics

The CX-3 is praised for its agile handling and responsive steering, making it a joy to drive on twisty roads. Its compact size also allows for easy maneuverability in tight spaces. In contrast, the CX-5’s larger size translates to more body roll during cornering, but its suspension still provides a comfortable ride.

Overall Driving Experience

The CX-3’s smaller engine and manual transmission option provide a more engaging driving experience, while the CX-5’s more powerful engine options offer increased acceleration and towing capacity. Ultimately, the choice between these two models depends on individual preferences regarding power, fuel efficiency, and handling.

Technology and Safety Features

When it comes to technology and safety features, both the Mazda CX-3 and Mazda CX-5 offer advanced systems that enhance the driving experience and provide peace of mind for passengers.

The CX-3’s infotainment system is equipped with a 7-inch touchscreen display, Bluetooth connectivity, and a 6-speaker audio system. It also features Mazda’s intuitive Commander Control interface, which allows drivers to control various functions using a central controller knob. Additionally, the CX-3 offers advanced safety features like adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and blind spot monitoring.

In contrast, the CX-5 offers an upgraded infotainment system with an 8-inch touchscreen display, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration, and a 12-speaker Bose premium audio system. It also features Mazda’s i-ACTIVSENSE safety suite, which includes advanced driver assistance systems like radar cruise control, lane keep assist, and automatic emergency braking.

Both models boast excellent crash test ratings, with the CX-3 earning a Top Safety Pick+ rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the CX-5 earning a 5-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

The key difference between the two models is the level of sophistication in their advanced safety features. The CX-5 offers more comprehensive systems, such as traffic sign recognition and intelligent city brake support, which provide an added layer of protection on the road.

Overall, both models demonstrate Mazda’s commitment to providing a safe and enjoyable driving experience, with each offering its own unique set of technology and safety features that cater to different driver preferences.

Practicality and Space

When it comes to practicality, both the Mazda CX-3 and CX-5 compact crossover SUVs excel in providing ample interior space, cargo capacity, and storage options.

The CX-3 offers 31 cubic feet of cargo space behind its rear seats, which can be expanded to 44.1 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down. Storage compartments abound, including a large center console bin, door pockets, and cupholders throughout the cabin.

In contrast, the CX-5 boasts a more spacious interior, with 30.9 cubic feet of cargo space behind its rear seats, increasing to 59.6 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down. Premium materials and thoughtful design enhance passenger comfort, featuring heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, and ample legroom.

While both models prioritize practicality, the CX-5’s increased cargo capacity and more spacious interior make it a better option for families or those who require frequent hauling. The CX-3, on the other hand, excels in its compact size, making it ideal for city dwellers or those seeking a more agile driving experience.

  • Cargo space behind rear seats:
    • Mazda CX-3: 31 cubic feet
    • Mazda CX-5: 30.9 cubic feet
  • Cargo space with rear seats folded down:
    • Mazda CX-3: 44.1 cubic feet
    • Mazda CX-5: 59.6 cubic feet

Conclusion and Recommendation

After examining the interior space, cargo capacity, and storage options of both Mazda CX-3 and CX-5, it’s clear that each model has its unique strengths and weaknesses.

Practicality: Both models prioritize passenger comfort, but the CX-5 offers more spacious seating for taller passengers. The CX-3, on the other hand, excels in terms of cargo space, with a larger hatch opening and adjustable cargo floor. This makes it an ideal choice for those who need to transport bulky items.

Drawbacks: The CX-5’s smaller rear windows can make reversing more challenging, while the CX-3’s smaller size can be a limitation when transporting large luggage or equipment.

Based on our findings, we recommend the Mazda CX-5 for families or individuals who prioritize passenger comfort and need a bit more space. However, the Mazda CX-3 is an excellent choice for those who require a compact SUV with impressive cargo capacity and agility in tight spaces.

  • Best suited for:
    • Families or individuals who prioritize passenger comfort
    • Those who need a bit more space for luggage or equipment
    • City dwellers who require a compact SUV for urban driving
  • Not recommended for:
    • Those who prioritize cargo space above all else (CX-3’s larger hatch opening is ideal)
    • Individuals who regularly transport large or bulky items

In conclusion, both the CX-3 and CX-5 are excellent options for those looking for a compact crossover SUV from Mazda. While they share some similarities, their unique features and strengths make them suitable for different types of buyers. The CX-3 is ideal for city dwellers who prioritize fuel efficiency and affordability, while the CX-5 is better suited for families or outdoor enthusiasts who require more space and power.